Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata
Date
Msg-id 200207312141.g6VLfvp24085@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>)
List pgsql-patches
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Perhaps.  At the time they were written they were just quick hacks for
> > debugging, but we've seen them needed often enough that maybe they need
> > to be promoted.
>
> Yes. Bruce, do you want to do the honors? Should we consider renaming
> them at the time of the move? (probably not, but it is the right time to
> ask)

I thought they were in /contrib because we didn't want them by default
in the admin's path.  They have to go looking for them to use them.  Is
that still a valid concern?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)
Date:
Subject: fix pg_dump memory leak
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: psql warning fix