Yes, I think that would be the way to go, or look at the stat functions
that return tuple sets and use those. That may be a cleaner solution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 03:11:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We have pg_stat_activity. Seems pg_locks should behave the same,
> > without the (). Let it show up in \dS. Do you need assistance with
> > this? I know FRS is neat, but logically it seems it should appear as a
> > table like that statistics stuff.
>
> So I should just add a view called "pg_locks" that calls the table
> function?
>
> I'll submit a new patch once Joe's anonymous composite type patch gets
> into CVS.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
