I agree plpgsql is a better file name, and example is prefered. Would
you send in a patch?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rod Taylor wrote:
> Took me longer than necessary before I figured out which side the stuff
> went on. So heres a quick example.
>
>
> Would it be wise to have the plsql.sgml file renamed to plpgsql.sgml?
> All of the internal tags are of the latter.
>
> The other thing I noticed is that most of the quick examples in the file
> use a para and synopsis. Is there a reason we're not using <example/> ?
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
