Question about LWLockAcquire's use of semaphores instead of spinlocks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert E. Bruccoleri
Subject Question about LWLockAcquire's use of semaphores instead of spinlocks
Date
Msg-id 200207270146.VAA27842@stone.congenomics.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Question about LWLockAcquire's use of semaphores instead of spinlocks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On SGI multiprocessor machines, I suspect that a spinlock
implementation of LWLockAcquire would give better performance than
using IPC semaphores.  Is there any specific reason that a spinlock
could not be used in this context?

+-----------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Robert E. Bruccoleri, Ph.D. | email: bruc@acm.org                |
| P.O. Box 314                | URL:   http://www.congen.com/~bruc |
| Pennington, NJ 08534        |                                    |
+-----------------------------+------------------------------------+


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: regd count(count(*)) in group by
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Virus Emails