On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 01:18:22AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm unexcited about the proposed gram.y changes, especially since you
> didn't document them. I do not think we need a SET DEFAULT variant;
> anyone bright enough to be toying with attstattarget at all can figure
> out how to revert it to -1 if they want.
I'm indifferent about SET DEFAULT, so I removed it.
> Otherwise it looks reasonable ...
Thanks for the code review.
A revised patch incorporating Tom's suggestions is attached.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
