Re: [GENERAL] Some Solaris notes, and an invitation - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Some Solaris notes, and an invitation
Date
Msg-id 20020719144256.H6252@mail.libertyrms.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Some Solaris notes, and an invitation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 02:15:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > The following diff adds the NetBSD qsort() for all Solaris platforms.
>
> Do we know that Solaris is the only platform with the problem?
>
> In the back of my mind is the thought that if we used this qsort on
> *all* platforms, we'd eliminate some platform-to-platform sort ordering
> differences that occasionally cause regression test problems.  And I
> see little downside to using it everywhere.

What if someone else's qsort is faster than NetBSD's?  NetBSD is not
famous for its high speeds, although I haven't any reason ot suppose
that this library is any differnt than FreeBSD's (or any other
Berkeley-derived system), since I haven't checked.  Just asking,
really.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan                               87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M6K 3E3
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Rijndael AES Cipher
Date:
Subject: NLS translation for libpq(.so) - pt_BR
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: More heap tuple header fixes