Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes
Date
Msg-id 200207161559.g6GFx7128098@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> (In related news, how about filling up the oid/relfilenode numbers with
> >> zeros on the left, so a directory listing would reflect the numerical
> >> order?)
> 
> > Yes, hex may be interesting as a more compact, consistent format.  We
> > need to change the docs so oid2name and queries convert to hex on
> > output.
> 
> I don't really see the value-added here.  If we had made this decision
> before releasing 7.1, I'd not have objected; but at this point we're
> talking about breaking oid2name and any similar scripts that people
> may have developed, for what's really a *very* marginal gain.  Who cares
> whether a directory listing reflects numerical order?

I don't see the big value either, just brainstorming.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes
Next
From: Tim Hart
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] line datatype