Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes
Date
Msg-id 12989.1026835020@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> (In related news, how about filling up the oid/relfilenode numbers with
>> zeros on the left, so a directory listing would reflect the numerical
>> order?)

> Yes, hex may be interesting as a more compact, consistent format.  We
> need to change the docs so oid2name and queries convert to hex on
> output.

I don't really see the value-added here.  If we had made this decision
before releasing 7.1, I'd not have objected; but at this point we're
talking about breaking oid2name and any similar scripts that people
may have developed, for what's really a *very* marginal gain.  Who cares
whether a directory listing reflects numerical order?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes