Re: pg_dumpall forces plain text format - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Andrew Kohlsmith
Subject Re: pg_dumpall forces plain text format
Date
Msg-id 200207111018.19778@-mixdown.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dumpall forces plain text format  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
> > Or is that on the TODO for whenever foreign keys can be across databases?
> I very seriously doubt that PG will *ever* support foreign keys across
> databases.

No problem.  I'm not that advanced of a user or admin to want it, I was just
trying to peer into the crystal ball and try to anticipate future problems.
:-)

> The current development direction is not to improve communication across
> databases, but to support schemas and improve privilege checking so that
> users can more usefully be assigned separate schemas within a single
> database.  I think that multiple databases in a cluster will eventually
> be used only for the cases where you *want* airtight separation between
> two collections of data.

Understood.

> Hence, I'm not particularly concerned by complaints about lack of
> cross-database functionality --- the folks who think they want that
> actually want cross-schema operations, which will work fine in 7.3.

Thank you for your time and comments.  I feel a lot "safer" about these
backups now.

Regards,
Andrew

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Kohlsmith
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dumpall forces plain text format
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2.1 backend crash (convert_string_datum, locale)