Re: ECPG won't compile anymore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: ECPG won't compile anymore
Date
Msg-id 20020619073420.GC2783@feivel.credativ.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ECPG won't compile anymore  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 01:57:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> That would be trouble, but considering that we are not even thinking of
> going beta before late August, is it really a realistic risk?  bison

Yes. After all it's much easier to sync the two if I get smaller
changes. 

> seems to be making releases quite frequently lately.  They were at 1.30
> back in November, according to my archives, so that's 19 releases in the
> last 8 months.

True. But most of them are not for releases. I have no idea which vesion
number will be the one they release. Up to 1.35 they released
frequently, but then it stopped and 1.49 is quite far from 1.35.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Problem with SSL and IPv6
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: ECPG won't compile anymore