Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID
Date
Msg-id 20020607090922.W27088-100000@mail1.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at> writes:
> > > No comment on a planned 7.3 timeframe? :-(
> >
> > I think we are planning to go beta in late summer (end of August, say).
> > Probably in July we'll start pressing people to finish up any major
> > development items, or admit that they won't happen for 7.3.  So we've
> > still got a couple months of full-tilt development mode before we
> > start to worry about tightening up for release.
>
> I am concerned about slowing down too early.  We did that in previous
> releases and didn't get the beta focus we needed, and it was too
> paralyzing on people to know what is to be slowed and what to keep
> going.  I think a slowdown two weeks before beta would be fine.

Other then personal slow downs, there is no reason for anything to "slow
down" until beta itself starts ...




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of /etc/services?
Next
From: "Roderick A. Anderson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of /etc/services?