Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID
Date
Msg-id 200206070559.g575xNu22859@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at> writes:
> > No comment on a planned 7.3 timeframe? :-(
> 
> I think we are planning to go beta in late summer (end of August, say).
> Probably in July we'll start pressing people to finish up any major
> development items, or admit that they won't happen for 7.3.  So we've
> still got a couple months of full-tilt development mode before we
> start to worry about tightening up for release.

I am concerned about slowing down too early.  We did that in previous
releases and didn't get the beta focus we needed, and it was too
paralyzing on people to know what is to be slowed and what to keep
going.  I think a slowdown two weeks before beta would be fine.

Basically, I think the slowdown lengthened the time we were not doing
something productive.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of /etc/services?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID