Bruce,
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 08:49:21PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> mlw wrote:
> > Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll write it
> > for Windows.
> >
> > That being said, a SysV IPC interface for native Windows would be kind of
> > cool to have.
>
> I am wondering why we don't just use the Cygwin shm/sem code in our
> project, or maybe the Apache stuff; why bother reinventing the wheel.
Are you referring to cygipc above? If so, they even one of the original
cygipc authors would discourage this:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2001-09/msg00017.html
Specifically, Ludovic Lange states the following:
> I really think the solution would be to start again from scratch > another implementation, as was suggested. The
waywe did it was > quick and dirty, the goals weren't to have production systems > running on it but only to run
prototypes.So the internal design > (if there is any) may not be adequate for the cygwin project.
However, Rob Collins has contributed a MinGW daemon to Cygwin to support
switching users, System V IPC, etc. So, this code base may be a more
suitable starting point to satisfy PostgreSQL's native Win32 System V
IPC needs.
Jason
