Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > Of course, we would review any patch before application. I guess the
> > full path is:
> >
> > o Do we want this feature?
> > o How do we want the feature to behave?
> > o How do we want the feature implemented?
> > o Submit patch
> > o Review patch
> > o Apply patch
> >
> > I assume your point is that people shouldn't send in big patches
> > without going through the discussion first. Yes, that is ideal, but if
> > they don't, we just discuss it after the patch appears, and then decide
> > if we want to apply it or ask for modifications.
>
> For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
> Is there any consensus on it ?
Uh, we know we want dependency checking to fix many problems; see TODO
dependency checking section. As far as how it is implemented, I haven't
studied it. I was going to wait for Tom to like it first and then give
it a review.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
