Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> Of course, we would review any patch before application. I guess the
> full path is:
>
> o Do we want this feature?
> o How do we want the feature to behave?
> o How do we want the feature implemented?
> o Submit patch
> o Review patch
> o Apply patch
>
> I assume your point is that people shouldn't send in big patches
> without going through the discussion first. Yes, that is ideal, but if
> they don't, we just discuss it after the patch appears, and then decide
> if we want to apply it or ask for modifications.
For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
Is there any consensus on it ?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue