Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date
Msg-id 3CBB847C.D72E5DE9@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> Of course, we would review any patch before application.  I guess the
> full path is:
>
>         o  Do we want this feature?
>         o  How do we want the feature to behave?
>         o  How do we want the feature implemented?
>         o  Submit patch
>         o  Review patch
>         o  Apply patch
>
> I assume your point is that people shouldn't send in big patches
> without going through the discussion first.  Yes, that is ideal, but if
> they don't, we just discuss it after the patch appears, and then decide
> if we want to apply it or ask for modifications.

For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
Is there any consensus on it ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts