On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Isn't the "cmds" in the file names kind of redundant?
>
> That was at my suggestion, actually. I thought names like "aggregate.c"
> were too generic --- too easy to confuse with similarly-named files
> elsewhere in the tree. (For example, I regularly get confused by the
> existence of analyze.c in both commands/ and parser/.)
ya, but shouldn't the fact that its commands/analyze.c and
parser/analyze.c eliminate the confusion? :)
