Re: Small question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Small question
Date
Msg-id 200203221952.g2MJqTf02989@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Small question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Small question  (Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com> writes:
> >> It seems like it might be possible for libpq (or other clients) to keep
> >> track of the transaction state by paying attention to BEGIN, COMMIT,
> >> ABORT command-completion tags and ERROR messages, but I haven't worked
> >> through the details.
>
> >         PQexec(c, "BEGIN; SELECT now()");
>
> >     Will there even be a BEGIN command tag sent?
>
> Yes.  PQexec doesn't tell you about it, but one comes through.  (This
> is certainly true in current sources, and I believe has always been true.)
>
> It'd be nastier if we allowed functions to change the transaction-block
> state, but we don't...

We only need one bit to pass the transaction status back to the client.
Shame we can't throw that bit in there somewhere.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Small question
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Small question