Re: Refactoring of command.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Refactoring of command.c
Date
Msg-id 200202270315.g1R3FPv04041@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Refactoring of command.c  (John Gray <jgray@azuli.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I know that "renamed" files in CVS will lose their history (for
> tracability we presumably wouldn't rename them in the repository), so I
> accept that it may not be a great idea to rename them, but it seems a
> little redundant to use commands/dbcommands.c rather than
> commands/database.c. 
> 
> As I'm new to this kind of change, I assume that I'd just submit a
> normal context diff for this and rely on it not getting tangled up with
> any other patches to these files? Or is this *too* radical a reshuffle?
> :-)

Post the patch and we will try to get it approved quickly for
application.  That's about the only clean way I know to do it.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] COPY FROM is not 8bit clean
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactoring of command.c