> > It might be best to bounce all the pending patches back to the
> > submitters, and ask them to resubmit whatever they think is the
> > latest version. Particularly with the jdbc stuff, I think some
> > of that got applied already. Also, for stuff that is already
> > out of date (and some of it is!), it seems better to distribute
> > the update/merge work instead of putting it all on your shoulders.
>
> I will let the jdbc people chew on it. They are very good at
> evaluating the jdbc stuff at this point. Let's see what's left after a
> week. Peter's email to me sliced through a chunk of it already.
Actually, looking over the 48 patches items, 50% are either obviously
trivial or are jdbc patches that the jdbc group will handle. Let me
pair this down. I don't think it is big a deal as people think.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
