Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > The tree will get farther and farther out of sync with these patches,
> > making patch application harder as time goes on.
>
> Agreed, we cannot wait indefinitely.
>
> > If no one can look at them in one week, I question whether a few more
> > weeks will make any difference.
>
> Personally, I'm under a deadline for some internal Red Hat work, so
> this is not a good week to ask me to review stuff.
Oh, I didn't realize that. That is a good argument to extend it,
certainly.
> It might be best to bounce all the pending patches back to the
> submitters, and ask them to resubmit whatever they think is the
> latest version. Particularly with the jdbc stuff, I think some
> of that got applied already. Also, for stuff that is already
> out of date (and some of it is!), it seems better to distribute
> the update/merge work instead of putting it all on your shoulders.
I will let the jdbc people chew on it. They are very good at
evaluating the jdbc stuff at this point. Let's see what's left after a
week. Peter's email to me sliced through a chunk of it already.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
