Marc Lavergne wrote:
>
> Granted it's still slower than the InnoDB results and I did test against
> 7.2, but I'm sure with a little tweaking I could almost halve my times.
> I have to agree with the others, something looks awful funny about their
> results! However, I would add that it's all a moot point really since
> the benchmark doesn't even attempt to test concurrent transactions but
> that's probably for a reason! ;-)
All they have shown so far is that they can read our mailing lists. The SMP problems in 7.1.1 are well known,
yawn.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
