Re: [GENERAL] Problem (bug?) with like - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Problem (bug?) with like
Date
Msg-id 200112041955.fB4JtUA26642@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Problem (bug?) with like  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Problem (bug?) with like
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > But what about '%A%' vs. '%AC%'.  Seems the second is reasonably
> > different from the first the our optimizer may be fine with that.  Is it
> > only when the strings get longer that we lose specificity?
>
> Yeah, I don't think that the estimates are bad for one or two
> characters.  But the estimate gets real small real fast as you
> increase the number of match characters in the LIKE pattern.
> We need to slow that down some.

Yea, maybe a log base 2 decrease:

    1 char    1x
    2 char    2x
    4 char    3x
    8 char    4x
    16 char 5x

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Problem (bug?) with like
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Undocumented feature costs a lot of performance in COPY