Re: beta3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: beta3
Date
Msg-id 20011118224215.F82429-100000@earth.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: beta3  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: beta3
Re: beta3
Re: beta3
List pgsql-hackers
Okay, how do we want to address/fix/test this?

On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > The packaging problems need to be solved before we can build a release
> > candidate --- but I don't see why they should hold up beta3.  beta2 has
> > the same problems, so beta3 wouldn't be a regression.
>
> Considering the history of how-do-we-get-the-docs-in-the-tarball problem,
> I'd like to see at least one beta where this works before shipping a
> release candidate.  Otherwise I'll have no confidence at all that we're
> not going to ship the final release with last year's docs and no man
> pages.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brent Verner
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item inquiry/claim
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: format_type infelicity