Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date
Msg-id 200110180026.f9I0QOM19323@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration  (Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>)
List pgsql-jdbc
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 01:23:13PM -0700, Barry Lind wrote:
> > I don't like this patch.  If anything I think we should remove the
> > dependency on ANT, not remove the dependency on make.
> >
> > By requiring ANT, we provide yet another hurdle for someone wanting to
> > use JDBC with postgres.  I would prefer that the build environment be
> > the same for the database as for the jdbc code.
> >
> > Anything that makes it more difficult to download the source and get
> > going with it is a negative in my opinion.  And from my perspective
> > requiring the download of an additional tool (ANT in this case) makes it
> > more difficult.
>
> I have no strong feelings about current situation, I simply made
> it more flexible.  About changing it, you should consult JDBC
> maintainers first, maybe they have some good reason why its
> so...

Barry and Dave are the jdbc maintainers now and I think there is general
consensus that we want to get away from Ant if possible.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: JDBC PostgreSQhelL
Next
From: "Dave Cramer"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration