Re: Linux Version - Mailing list pgadmin-support
From | Ken Kinder |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Linux Version |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20011017141140.A19372@kenkinder.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Linux Version (Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
List | pgadmin-support |
I'm sorry if offended you or your work. I am honestly having trouble comprehending the development of a PostgreSQL GUI that isn't available for Linux. AFIAK, from attending user groups and other mailing lists, Postgres is used very rarely in non-Linux environments. I do still think you should specificly state the abscence of a Linux version on your web site and what the reasons for that are. On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:54:54PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ken Kinder [mailto:ken@kenkinder.com] > > Sent: 17 October 2001 17:04 > > To: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org > > Subject: [pgadmin-support] Linux Version > > > > > > I'm sure this has been questioned and answered before, but > > your mailing list search engine is down, and it isn't on your FAQ. > > > > Why isn't the development of a Linux version a higher > > priority than Windows? PostgreSQL itself is only for Unix, > > This is incorrect. PostgreSQL runs well on Windows NT/2000 and will also run > on Windows 9x/ME. > > > and as an Open Source database, it's absurd to have an Open > > Souce GUI for it that relies on a proprietary operating > > system that PostgreSQL users are not likely to use. > > Tell that to the thousands that have downloaded it. The original pgAdmin > project was started in 1997 because so many people kept asking for a good > PostgreSQL admin tool for Windows. > > > Because > > PostgreSQL itself is _only_ available for linux and unix, it > > seems silly to work on Windows GUIs. > > As I said, PostgreSQL is most certainly not only for *nix, and even if it > was, many people like myself (an IT Manager running a network of around 120 > workstations and a dozen or so servers of various types across 8 sites) use > Windows on our desktop machines through necessity. I run PostgreSQL on my > Windows 2000 laptop for developing pgAdmin, and on Linux servers for users > running applications on their Windows Workstations and as the backend for > some php powered websites. > > I know for a fact I'm not alone here. Whilst I would love to put Linux on > every desktop and get rid of M$ products it's just not possible in my > organisation and many others for numerous reasons. > > > You really should address the issue of using a standard > > operating system on your web site. > > A standard operating system like the ones supplied on probably 95% of the > PCs sold around the world you mean? > > > I don't know whether the rewrite made it better, but the fact > > that it isn't for Linux makes it worthless to me and most > > PostgreSQL users. > > It may be worthless to you, but to many it is not. That is fine by me, I'm > not forcing you to use it (though you may well miss out as I'm pretty sure > it's now the most comprehensive PostgreSQL toolset you'll find). There are > other tools such as pgAccess or phpPgAdmin that you could use. > > Of course, you could run it under Wine like myself and one of my staff who > both run KDE on Slackware Linux on our test boxes at work.... Oh, I'm sorry, > did the (as yet incomplete) website/documentation not mention that pgAdmin > runs under Wine? > > And before you complain about that omission, bear in mind that I myself have > written (in my own time) and given away around 30,000 lines of code on this > new version of pgAdmin alone since March or so this year. I don't get paid > for it and haven't had time to finish writing up every last possible thing > you can do with pgAdmin. > > Dave. -- Ken Kinder www.kenkinder.com
pgadmin-support by date: