> Okay, here is some bad news: I just looked into the SQL99 standard for
> the names of predefined character set names, and here is the list:
>
> SQL_CHARACTER
> GRAPHIC_IRV or ASCII_GRAPHIC
> LATIN1 <==== !!!
> ISO8BIT or ASCII_FULL
> UTF16
> UTF8
> UCS2
> SQL_TEXT
> SQL_IDENTIFIER
>
> So perhaps we should keep the LATIN1 thing after all? I don't like it,
> but the rules...
>
> Comments?
No way. We always need to follow the standard.
BTW, do you have the SQL99 docs online somewhere? I have a draft, but
it seemss some part of it, especially NCHAR stuffs might be change in
the very last stage...
--
Tatsuo Ishii
