Re: Patch for JDBC to update some comments - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Patch for JDBC to update some comments
Date
Msg-id 200108161329.f7GDTdZ11979@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patch for JDBC to update some comments  (Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

    http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

> This patch updates some comments in the DatabaseMetaData classes to
> reflect a mail thread that discussed our conformance (or lack thereof)
> to the SQL92 spec.
>
> thanks,
> --Barry

> *** ./interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/DatabaseMetaData.java.orig    Sat Aug  4 12:32:04 2001
> --- ./interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/DatabaseMetaData.java    Wed Aug 15 22:39:55 2001
> ***************
> *** 680,686 ****
>
>     /**
>      * Does this driver support the ANSI-92 entry level SQL grammar?
> !    * All JDBC Compliant drivers must return true.
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> --- 680,691 ----
>
>     /**
>      * Does this driver support the ANSI-92 entry level SQL grammar?
> !    * All JDBC Compliant drivers must return true. We currently
> !    * report false until 'schema' support is added.  Then this
> !    * should be changed to return true, since we will be mostly
> !    * compliant (probably more compliant than many other databases)
> !    * And since this is a requirement for all JDBC drivers we
> !    * need to get to the point where we can return true.
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> ***************
> *** 726,732 ****
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Is some form of outer join supported?  From my knowledge, nope.
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> --- 731,737 ----
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Is some form of outer join supported?
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> ***************
> *** 737,744 ****
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Are full nexted outer joins supported?  Well, we dont support any
> !    * form of outer join, so this is no as well
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> --- 742,748 ----
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Are full nexted outer joins supported?
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> ***************
> *** 749,756 ****
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Is there limited support for outer joins?  (This will be true if
> !    * supportFullOuterJoins is true)
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> --- 753,759 ----
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Is there limited support for outer joins?
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> *** ./interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/DatabaseMetaData.java.orig    Wed Aug 15 22:25:44 2001
> --- ./interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/DatabaseMetaData.java    Wed Aug 15 22:37:10 2001
> ***************
> *** 680,686 ****
>
>     /**
>      * Does this driver support the ANSI-92 entry level SQL grammar?
> !    * All JDBC Compliant drivers must return true.
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> --- 680,691 ----
>
>     /**
>      * Does this driver support the ANSI-92 entry level SQL grammar?
> !    * All JDBC Compliant drivers must return true.  We currently
> !    * report false until 'schema' support is added.  Then this
> !    * should be changed to return true, since we will be mostly
> !    * compliant (probably more compliant than many other databases)
> !    * And since this is a requirement for all JDBC drivers we
> !    * need to get to the point where we can return true.
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> ***************
> *** 726,732 ****
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Is some form of outer join supported?  From my knowledge, nope.
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> --- 731,737 ----
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Is some form of outer join supported?
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> ***************
> *** 737,744 ****
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Are full nexted outer joins supported?  Well, we dont support any
> !    * form of outer join, so this is no as well
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> --- 742,748 ----
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Are full nexted outer joins supported?
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> ***************
> *** 749,756 ****
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Is there limited support for outer joins?  (This will be true if
> !    * supportFullOuterJoins is true)
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs
> --- 753,759 ----
>     }
>
>     /**
> !    * Is there limited support for outer joins?
>      *
>      * @return true if so
>      * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Patch for JDBC to update some comments
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords