> Deja vu... didn't we have this discussion a month or two back?? :-) (
> http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=115437#thread )
>
> I'm all for it for the RPM's, at least, if others are game. We left off with
> the question of where it would best be stored....
>
> There is, in fact, an outstanding issue with the RPM initscript that I'm
> still working on -- the 'sometimes I get a failure that isn't really a
> failure' deal....I can't reproduce it.
Let me add that Red Hat is now distributing a different RPM with their
Red Hat Database, or at least I think they are. Can someone confirm?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
