Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From wsheldah@lexmark.com
Subject Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)
Date
Msg-id 200107121411.KAA29905@interlock2.lexmark.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)  (Alexey Borzov <borz_off@rdw.ru>)
Responses Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)
List pgsql-general

The list looks fantastic.  I'm now looking forward to this release.  Sounds like
it's planned for just 6-9 months after the 7.1 release, or thereabouts?  Good
agressive schedule.

I would like to request one more feature of course:  support for ALTER TABLE
tablename MODIFY columnname [create clause] would make my life much easier.
When designing a new database from scratch, I often find myself having to change
column types during the very early stages of development.

That would also help users who need to convert their MONEY columns to
money-formatted decimal coluns once this release comes out and they upgrade.

Again, thanks for all the hard work.

Wes Sheldahl



Bruno Wolff III <bruno%wolff.to@interlock.lexmark.com> on 07/12/2001 09:24:31 AM

To:   Alexey Borzov <borz_off%rdw.ru@interlock.lexmark.com>
cc:   Bruce Momjian <pgman%candle.pha.pa.us@interlock.lexmark.com>, Tim Barnard
      <tbarnard%povn.com@interlock.lexmark.com>,
      pgsql-general%postgresql.org@interlock.lexmark.com (bcc: Wesley
      Sheldahl/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject:  [GENERAL] Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)


On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 11:04:11AM +0400,
  Alexey Borzov <borz_off@rdw.ru> wrote:
>
> Will you be even kinder and enlighten us, mere users, on the features
> planned for this release? ;

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/todo.html

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: View prevents index
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU?