Re: Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages
Date
Msg-id 200107112155.f6BLt3927197@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages  ("Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
> "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" wrote:
>   >> and it was never submitted to us a a patch.
>   >
>   >According to the README it was. Oliver, could you comment on this please?
>
> It was, a couple of months back.  Peter made some criticism of its use of
> autoconf, which I have changed.  I have not resubmitted the patch because
> the core team seemed to think it was not sufficiently portable.  If people
> want to include it in the main release, I will resubmit a revised patch.

I think our current idea is to have people run local ident servers to
handle this.  We don't have any OS-specific stuff in pg_hba.conf and I
am not sure if we want to add that complexity.  What do others think?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martín Marqués
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime