Re: Vacuum and Transactions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Vacuum and Transactions
Date
Msg-id 200107061849.f66Inbw09583@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Vacuum and Transactions  ("Trewern, Ben" <Ben.Trewern@mowlem.com>)
Responses Re: Vacuum and Transactions
List pgsql-general
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> In 7.2, VACUUM will not require an exclusive lock.
>
> > Care to elaborate on that?  How are you going to do it?
>
> Uh, have you not been paying attention to pg-hackers for the
> last two months?
>
> I am assuming here that concurrent VACUUM will become the default
> kind of vacuum, and the old style will be invoked by some other
> syntax (VACUUM FULL ..., maybe).

By concurrent vacuum, do you mean the auto-vacuum you are doing?  I
realize that will not need a lock.  Are you changing default VACUUM so
it only moves rows inside existing blocks too?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Joshua Jore
Date:
Subject: Re: Newbie DBD::Pg question
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum and Transactions