Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date
Msg-id 200106261633.f5QGXqM16901@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> 
> > > > > For the same reason I don't see any value in the idea of adding
> > > > > crypt-based double encryption to clients.  We don't really want to
> > > > > support that over the long run, so why put effort into it?
> > > > 
> > > > The only reason to add double-crypt is so we can continue to use
> > > > /etc/passwd entries on systems that use crypt() in /etc/passwd.
> > > 
> > > Haven't many systems (at least Linux and FreeBSD) switched from this
> > > to other algorithms as default, like MD5? (and usually found in /etc/shadow)
> > 
> > Yes, most BSD's are MD5.  I wasn't sure about Linux. 
> 
> Most recent (3-4 years and newer) use PAM, which can use MD5 as an
> underlying module.

But what is the default?  crypt or md5?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords