Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date
Msg-id 200106261630.f5QGUB216675@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
Responses Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > > For the same reason I don't see any value in the idea of adding
> > > crypt-based double encryption to clients.  We don't really want to
> > > support that over the long run, so why put effort into it?
> > 
> > The only reason to add double-crypt is so we can continue to use
> > /etc/passwd entries on systems that use crypt() in /etc/passwd.
> 
> Haven't many systems (at least Linux and FreeBSD) switched from this
> to other algorithms as default, like MD5? (and usually found in /etc/shadow)

Yes, most BSD's are MD5.  I wasn't sure about Linux.  If it is md5 by
default that would remove many sites from using crypt in secondary
password files already.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords