Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact
Date
Msg-id 200106222206.f5MM6cI26794@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact
List pgsql-general
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> This does remind me that I'd been thinking of suggesting that we
> >> raise the default -B to something more reasonable, maybe 1000 or so
> >> (yielding an 8-meg-plus shared memory area).
>
> > BSD/OS has a 4MB max but we document how to increase it by recompiling
> > the kernel.
>
> Hmm.  Anyone like the idea of a platform-specific default established
> by configure?  We could set it in the template file on platforms where
> the default SHMMAX is too small to allow 1000 buffers.

Template file seems like a good idea for platforms that can't handle the
default.  I don't think configure should be doing such tests because the
target could be a different kernel.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: web site suggestion
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact