Re: Re: [JDBC] unlink large objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: [JDBC] unlink large objects
Date
Msg-id 200106092032.f59KWkt28228@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [JDBC] unlink large objects  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: [JDBC] unlink large objects  (Philip Crotwell <crotwell@seis.sc.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Philip Crotwell <crotwell@seis.sc.edu> writes:
> > I was vacuuming, but as the owner of the database. When I do that there
> > are messages that should have clued me in, lke
> > NOTICE:  Skipping "pg_largeobject" --- only table owner can VACUUM it
> 
> > From now on I will vacuum as user postgres, but I wonder if there is a
> > need for individual users to be able to vacuum large obects by themselves.
> 
> Good point.  More generally, it seems like it might be a good idea to
> allow the owner of an individual database to vacuum all the system
> catalogs in it, even if he's not the superuser.  Comments anyone?

Seems db owner should be able to do whatever they want to the non-global
system tables.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: grant and SQL92
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Baby girl