On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 12:29:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org> writes:
> > i imagine it would be architectually difficult to have seperate user/group
> > tables per database.
>
> Codewise it would be trivial --- remove 'em from the list of shared
> relations. From the point of view of backwards compatibility, however,
> that's not likely to happen.
where are these relations? is this a compile-time thing, or can it be done
on-the-fly?
--
[ Jim Mercer jim@reptiles.org +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ Now with more and longer words for your reading enjoyment. ]
