> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
> > > So outing myself not beeing a *real programmer*, this is what
> > > I have so far:
> >
> > Hmm ... what is the performance of all this like? Seems like a lot
> > of overhead. Can it be turned off?
>
> Current performance loss is about 2-4% wallclock measured. I
> expect it to become better when turning some of the functions
> into macros.
At 2-4%, I assume it is not enabled by default. I can see the query
string part being enabled by default though.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
