> > You can send me a totally new patch if you wish. That way, you can
> > throw the whole patch to the patches list for comment and improvement.
>
> I'll do that.
>
> > Please keep going and resolve these inheritance issues.
>
> It's not that there's inheritance issues in my patch. I am actually certain
> that it will work fine with the ONLY keyword. However, I will make some
> changes and submit it to pgsql-patches.
>
> The problem is that although my patch can quite happily remove all
> constraints of the same name from all the child tables, the problem is - can
> we be sure that all the constraints with that name are actually inherited
> from the parent constraint. Answer - no. At least, not until the add
> constraint stuff is all fixed. So maybe I will just hash out inheritance
> support for the time being.
Oh, I was hoping you could at least list _all_ the inheritance issues
for the TODO list. Seems you have found some already. If we have that,
we can get a plan for someone to finally fix them all.
What we really need is a list, and a discussion, and decisions, rather
than just letting it lay around.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
