> The jdbc1 code does not have the problem that this patch corrects. So
> no it does not need to be and should not be applied to the jdbc1 area.
>
> I also noticed that that the original patch which was for the
> jdbc2/ResultSet.java file was also applied to the jdbc1/ResultSet.java
> file on the main trunk of the CVS. This will not work and that patch
> needs to be removed from jdbc1/ResultSet.java. (The variable the patch
> uses doesn't exist in the jdbc1 code thus the current jdbc1 code will
> not compile).
>
> The jdbc1 and jdbc2 sets of files are sufficiently different that
> patches for one should not be applied to the other.
Got it. Backed out of jdbc1 in current.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
