On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 07:19:01AM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > Everybody is asking "What is the equivalent of Linux in SQL databases
> > ??"
> > The answer is "PostgreSQL" RDBMS server.
>
> Oh please. Can we stop trying to tie everything to the current front
> runner. I mean, PostgreSQL uses the BSD style license, development
It uses _the_ BSD license.
> is done under the BSD (cathedral) model and hey, it was invented at
> Berkeley in the first place. How is it the "equivalent of Linux"
> other than that it has the same price tag more or less.
I'm not defending the comparison/analogy, just saying that it makes
sense to lay people who have heard of "Linux" when they are explained
about PostgreSQL.
-Roberto
--
+----| http://fslc.usu.edu USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club |------+
Roberto Mello - Computer Science, USU - http://www.brasileiro.net
http://www.sdl.usu.edu - Space Dynamics Lab, Developer
Bad command or file name. Go sit in corner.
