Re: pg_index.indislossy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_index.indislossy
Date
Msg-id 200105150024.f4F0OKp25526@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_index.indislossy  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_index.indislossy  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Is lossy and partial indexes the same?
> 
> No.
> 
> > I can't see how they were
> > supposed to be used.  The _only_ mention of this field I see in
> > indexcmd.c, around line 132.
> 
> You missed a few then --- the most critical being in createplan.c.
> 
> AFAIK this is a working feature, and I am going to insist that you
> keep your hands off it ...

Really, it actually works?  What are they?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Installation on SGI IRIX 6.5.10
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Installation on SGI IRIX 6.5.10