Tom,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 05:19:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com> writes:
> >> I suppose that we might consider adding these libraries to LIBS not
> >> DLLLIBS, but that's cleanup work that I'd rather not try to do under
> >> time pressure (especially since I can't test it here).
>
> > Can we commit my updated patch for 7.1RC3? I promise to help clean up
> > the above for RC4 or final. Is this acceptable?
>
> I just did commit your patch (plus some editorializing of my own, which
> you should test ;-)).
I just tested the latest CVS and all looks good -- even horology.
> I'd say that getting rid of DLLLIBS entirely is cleanup that we can
> leave for the 7.2 cycle, if we do it at all. It does seem like merging
> DLLLIBS into LIBS might be a good idea, but perhaps we'd best see what
> emerges from Fred's NT service work before we take that step.
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
