Re: Red Hat bashing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
Subject Re: Red Hat bashing
Date
Msg-id 20010306165816.E624@store.zembu.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 04:20:13PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
> Nathan Myers wrote:
> > That is why there is no problem with version skew in the syscall
> > argument structures on a correctly-configured Linux system.  (On a
> > Red Hat system it is very easy to get them out of sync, but RH fans
> > are used to problems.)
> 
> Is RedHat bashing really necessary here? 

I recognize that my last seven words above contributed nothing.
In the future I will only post strictly factual statements about
Red Hat and similarly charged topics, and keep the opinions to
myself.  I value the collegiality of this list too much to risk 
it further.  I offer my apologies for violating it.

By the way... do they call Red Hat "RedHat" at Red Hat? 

Nathan Myers
ncm@zembu.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: Red Hat bashing