Re: couple of general questions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Culley Harrelson
Subject Re: couple of general questions
Date
Msg-id 20010119154312.47656.qmail@web9605.mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to couple of general questions  (Culley Harrelson <culleyharrelson@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general


------------------------
Best, depending on the scenario. In cases where you
are using a fixed number
of characters, there's no need for the overhead of a
varchar. For instance
if you are storing state abbreviations, they will
ALWAYS be 2 characters.
The database can look up those fixed fields faster.
But if you are storing
full state names, it would be a waste to have all
those passing spaces so
that you could fit Mississippi with Maine. All that
being said, it's my
understanding that there will be no benefit to using
the CHAR type over the
VARCHAR type in 7.1 due to architectural changes.
-----------------------------------


Is there any difference between varchar and text other
than varchar places a
cap on the number of characters?

Culley



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tony Grant
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb doesn not create template1 database
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Questions about Synonyms - Again