Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh
Date
Msg-id 20001116093243.A7129@rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Responses Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh  ("'Marko Kreen'" <marko@l-t.ee>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 04:16:26PM +1100, Philip Warner wrote:
> 
> and possibly,
> 
>     Create Module foo_mod from library 'path-to-lib';
> 
> The idea being to only store whe function signature and enough details to
> get to the info-function. If 'Create Module' were allowed, then it would
> automatically create appropriate function definitions when the statement
> was executed.
> 

Phil - be careful with the nomenclature. We've got another naming collision,
here. SQL9[29] talk about modules, which may or may not be related to what
your suggesting here.

Ross
-- 
Open source code is like a natural resource, it's the result of providing
food and sunshine to programmers, and then staying out of their way.
[...] [It] is not going away because it has utility for both the developers 
and users independent of economic motivations.  Jim Flynn, Sunnyvale, Calif.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: Could turn on -O2 in AIX
Next
From: "'Marko Kreen'"
Date:
Subject: Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh