Re: New Privilege model purposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck) |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: New Privilege model purposal |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | 200007251753.TAA20889@hot.jw.home Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: New Privilege model purposal (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>) |
| Responses |
Re: New Privilege model purposal
(Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
Re: New Privilege model purposal (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>) Re: New Privilege model purposal (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| List | pgsql-hackers |
Karel Zak wrote: > > I not sure, but if I good remember nobody said somethig bad about > PetreE proposal for this, why you prepare new? IMHO Peter's proposal > was good. Seems I missed that discussion. Sometimes I start to drop incoming eMails by subject. If then the discussion moves to something different without changing the subject, you won't see me on that. Anyway, I haven't found a complete proposal in the ML archive. Consider my proposal "derived work" from hisone, if it is similar and let's combine all the ideas into one complete thing. Peter, have you done anything into that direction already? > And small suggestion, we need the "GRANT ... WITH ADMIN OPTION" or > something like this. What should that do? Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
pgsql-hackers by date: