Re: [GENERAL] How to handle non-postgres questions? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: [GENERAL] How to handle non-postgres questions?
Date
Msg-id 20000128135954.A12248@rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to How to handle non-postgres questions?  (davidb@vectormath.com)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 01:41:52PM -0600, davidb@vectormath.com wrote:
> Occasionally a question is posted to this list that is not a question
> about postgres, but to which I know the answer.  When this happens, I
> usually reply only to the person who posted the question, rather than to
> the whole list.  I do this to minimize non-postgres traffic on the list.
> However, this has the disadvantage of making it seem that questions
> that are posted to the list are ignored.  Is responding only to the
> sender the correct thing to do, or should I include the whole list?
>

I'd say, if it's a sort answer (like this one ;-), post it as well. If it's
long  and detailed, go ahead and send email, but if you want, post a brief
reply to the list, usually just quoting the question, and saying "Answered
in private email"

Ross
P.S. Watch your line lengths!

--
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu>
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St.,  Houston, TX 77005

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: davidb@vectormath.com
Date:
Subject: How to handle non-postgres questions?
Next
From: Nicolas Huillard
Date:
Subject: RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4