Re: unnest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: unnest
Date
Msg-id 20000.1101751271@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unnest  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> Problem is that a polymorphic SRF cannot (currently at least) both 
> accept and return type anyarray.

Beyond that, would the proposed function really be SQL-compliant other
than this one point?  I had the idea that UNNEST required some
fundamental changes (but I might be confusing it with something else).
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: Status of server side Large Object support?
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce