Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Date
Msg-id 1e831867-c46c-8f21-79d4-5de70cac5822@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/05/2018 05:25 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Tomas,
> 
> * Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Tomas Vondra
>> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks for looking into this. I agree your patch is more consistent and
>>> generally cleaner.
>>
>> This is classified as a bug fix, and is marked as waiting on author. I
>> am moving it to next CF as work continues.
> 
> This is still in waiting-on-author state; it'd be great to get your 
> thoughts on where this patch is and what the next steps are to move
> it forward. If you need additional feedback or there needs to be
> more discussion (perhaps with Tom) then maybe this should be in
> needs-review instead, but it'd be great if you could review the
> discussion and patch again and at least provide an update on it (last
> update from you was in November).
> 

Hmmm, I'm not sure, TBH.

As I already mentioned, Tom's updated patch is better than what I posted
initially, and I agree with his approach to the remaining issues he
pointed out. But I somehow assumed that he's already looking into that.

Tom, do you plan to look into this patch soon, or should I?

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Finnerty
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel append plan instability/randomness
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - add \if support