Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Date
Msg-id 13711.1515440364@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
List pgsql-hackers
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> As I already mentioned, Tom's updated patch is better than what I posted
> initially, and I agree with his approach to the remaining issues he
> pointed out. But I somehow assumed that he's already looking into that.
> Tom, do you plan to look into this patch soon, or should I?

No, I thought you were going to run with those ideas.  I have a lot of
other stuff on my plate ...

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/Python SD dict wiped?
Next
From: Jesper Pedersen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table